Back

Rules and Dependability

Slightly Edited rules and dependability.

1. Prohibited Content: Pornographic or explicit material is strictly prohibited. Images from movies or games may be exempt depending upon contextual appropriateness.

2. Harassment: Any form of repeated or excessive harassment outside of friendly joking is not tolerated. Warnings and bans will be given accordingly. Depending on the severity of the issue the warnings can range from One thru Five warnings before a potential or a full on ban.

3. Racism: Extreme and direct racism is not tolerated. Light-hearted remarks within the context of humor may be tolerated, but deliberate discriminatory language will lead to warnings or potential bans. Once again on this it depends on the severity of the issue ranging in Two thru Six warnings and /or then a ban.

4. Spam: Spamming is permissible when nearing the 1000th comment as well and if so the owner of said post allows it. Also excluding serious discussions. However, in other situations, individuals will receive up to three warnings for disruptive behavior. Persistent spamming will result in a ban.

5. Identity Policy: Alternative accounts associated with hate speech, falsified information, or impersonation will be promptly addressed. Users will be asked to amend usernames or cease using accounts to comply with guidelines.

6. Hate-Posting: Posts containing hate speech ( on a certain level past a decent form) or discriminatory content are strictly prohibited. You ARE allowed to talk shit on each other but once again no racism. Moderators will advise against such behavior. Appropriate action, including post deletion, may be taken by the moderation team if needed.

If anything on an issue which you or someone has an issue with , go ahead and ask a moderator about anything you need help with or would like to report.

Questions only in this chat , any other will result in the comment being deleted and possible warnings.

Comments (79)

Feel like we should have rules for mods on a mod post

Nah I mean restrictions so we don’t accidentally or purposely mod abuse

I ain't reading all those rules

β„‘π”ͺ π”šπ”¦π”±π”₯ 𝔖𝔱𝔲𝔭𝔦𝔑

niga

strike 1

π’€° π•Ώπ–π–Š π•Άπ–“π–Žπ–Œπ–π–™ π’€°

1, your not a mod, 2 he didnt say it

he just removed one n

if I said it I would get a strike

it's not the actual hard r. And matt permits it. So it is not a strike.

Cosmo the Intern

it's not the actual hard r. And matt permits it. So it is not a strike.

uh no

β„‘π”ͺ π”šπ”¦π”±π”₯ 𝔖𝔱𝔲𝔭𝔦𝔑

so " no strike fucking 1 " opal

uh no if I said it I would get a strike

β„‘π”ͺ π”šπ”¦π”±π”₯ 𝔖𝔱𝔲𝔭𝔦𝔑

get out bum

no you have a strike

devvy malky

deal with it

As another mod, i'm vetoing ur strike claim. deal with it.

Cosmo the Intern

As another mod, i'm vetoing ur strike claim. deal with it.

HOW

well we all know you are biased against ethan so i'm vetoing it based on that. also, it does not explicitly break the rules, and matt allows it.

Cosmo the Intern

well we all know you are biased against ethan so i'm vetoing it based on that. also, it does not explicitly break the rules, and matt allows it.

no? I'm not against him?

Comment deleted by Bismarck
β„‘π”ͺ π”šπ”¦π”±π”₯ 𝔖𝔱𝔲𝔭𝔦𝔑

cosmo imma let u deal with period over here

can I say the n word

Comment deleted by Bismarck
β„‘π”ͺ π”šπ”¦π”±π”₯ 𝔖𝔱𝔲𝔭𝔦𝔑

i never said the " n word"

you said "niga:

Another New Blach

@eb what are your thoughts on this?

Okay, look. This whole "rules and dependability" post is a joke, just like everything else here. They put "depends" right in the rules, which means there ARE no rules.

If a word is the "n word," then it's the "n word" for everyone, not just for people some mod doesn't like. "Light-hearted remarks" is what idiots say when they want to get away with something. Either it's racist or it's not. No "depending" on who says it or who they're saying it to.

Opal's right about the double standard. These mods are just proving that their "rules" are about as solid as a wet tissue. It's a free-for-all if you're buddies with the right people. Pathetic.

@eb can you explain the Ashton parks thing that happened a while ago?

Another New Blach

@eb can you explain the Ashton parks thing that happened a while ago?

Look, I don't know what random "Ashton Parks thing" you're blabbing about. Sounds like some nobody drama that no one cares about. If it was important, I'd know. It's not. Move on.