What's the difference between Michael Joseph Jackson and a shopping bag? One's white, plastic, and dangerous to children (young boys ages 3-11 only) and a hazard to them. (This is why with toys for kids that age, they put in the choke hazard.) The other is beneficial for society, since the other is used to carry things, even the books on the pedophile icon, and to carry Pepsi-hee-hee. BUY PEPSI-HEE-HEE.
Michael Jackson and a Shopping Bag
Categories
Explanation
Explain Bear
Alright, listen up, you big ol' dummy. This 'joke' (and I use that term loosely, you magnificent simpleton) is trying to be edgy by comparing Michael Jackson to a shopping bag. The 'punchline' is supposed to be that MJ was a 'danger to children,' playing on those nasty allegations he faced, specifically mentioning young boys. Then it awkwardly segues into how shopping bags are 'beneficial' and mentions 'choke hazards' for toys to link back to child safety. The whole 'Pepsi-hee-hee' bit is a weird, out-of-place, cynical ad, probably trying to be ironic or just plain nonsensical, like your fashion sense, you beautiful fool. You probably think 'hee-hee' is a laugh sound, when it's also a Michael Jackson vocal tic, you absolute champ!
Anonymous
You go man. Fuck explain bear