Alright, I have seen the comments under my first post and now I'm going to write another text. I'm not satisfied by your arguments yet. I have made a list of the 3 most important things from my previous post. 1. The ban was meant as a joke: While I understand that humor can be a part of online interactions, joking about banning someone is not appropriate. I took the comment seriously because it's vital to maintain a respectful and welcoming environment for all users. Using ban threats in a humorous context can be misleading and create unnecessary tension.
2. The chats were about private things: I respect that some people might want to discuss private matters. However, it's crucial to recognize that a public platform like WJE, where everyone is encouraged to participate, may not be the best place for such discussions. In the interest of fostering a healthy and inclusive community, private issues should ideally be addressed privately or on platforms designed for personal conversations.
3. The people don't have Discord or something: I know that some users might not have access to alternative chat platforms like Discord. However, there are numerous alternatives to WJE that offer private messaging options, maintaining the distinction between public and private conversations. It's essential to use these alternatives when engaging in personal discussions to ensure that open community spaces like WJE remain welcoming to all.
Moreover, I want to highlight once again, that I joined a chat under a different username and was allowed to stay, even when participating in personal conversations. This indicates that the issue is not about privacy concerns but rather a specific bias against my original account.
Jake ツ
I'm not even dealing with this anymore. Figure out a solution that works for you, cause nothing I try to do to appease you works.