Back

Jake.

Comments (109)

can you explain the difference between pavlovian and operant conditioning

The difference between Pavlovian and operant conditioning is a central topic in the field of behavioral psychology. Pavlovian conditioning is a type of classical conditioning, which was first described by the Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov in the early 20th century. In this type of conditioning, an otherwise neutral stimulus (such as the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (such as the smell or taste of food). Over time, the neutral stimulus comes to elicit the same physiological response as the biologically relevant stimulus, even in the absence of the latter. For example, Pavlov's experiments showed that dogs could be trained to salivate in response to the sound of a bell instead of the smell of food. He did this by ringing a bell every time he presented the dogs with food. After a while, the mere sound of the bell was enough to elicit a salivation response in the dogs, even if no food was present. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is a type of modern behaviorism that was developed by B.F. Skinner in the mid-20th century. In this type of conditioning, an organism's behavior is reinfo

make it simpler

i’m kinda dumb

so, if dog hear bell ring and than food come, dog is make relation of bell to food, so when bell do the ringy dingy dog become hungry because bell is symbol of food

59 additional comments

my biology final

and i blame charles darwin

and his stupid theory

why couldn’t natural selection taken him

Cosmologistinterntobe

no, blame bacon

i like bacon

kill yourself jake.

Cosmologistinterntobe

no not monke. we is ap

i got a 92 on my apcsp fina

real life footage of jake

π•―π–”π–“π–šπ–™π•―π–—π–†π–œπ–Ÿπ–Ÿ

no

why you no consent to the great ap family