The difference between Pavlovian and operant conditioning is a central topic in the field of behavioral psychology. Pavlovian conditioning is a type of classical conditioning, which was first described by the Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov in the early 20th century. In this type of conditioning, an otherwise neutral stimulus (such as the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (such as the smell or taste of food). Over time, the neutral stimulus comes to elicit the same physiological response as the biologically relevant stimulus, even in the absence of the latter. For example, Pavlov's experiments showed that dogs could be trained to salivate in response to the sound of a bell instead of the smell of food. He did this by ringing a bell every time he presented the dogs with food. After a while, the mere sound of the bell was enough to elicit a salivation response in the dogs, even if no food was present. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is a type of modern behaviorism that was developed by B.F. Skinner in the mid-20th century. In this type of conditioning, an organism's behavior is reinfo
so, if dog hear bell ring and than food come, dog is make relation of bell to food, so when bell do the ringy dingy dog become hungry because bell is symbol of food
so, if dog hear bell ring and than food come, dog is make relation of bell to food, so when bell do the ringy dingy dog become hungry because bell is symbol of food
Pavlovian conditioning is when a previously neutral stimulus (like the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (like food) repeatedly, until the sound of the bell alone can trigger the same physical response as the sight, taste or smell of food. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is when positive or negative reinforcement (like rewards or punishments) are given in response to an organism's behavior, to increase or decrease the likelihood of that behavior repeating in the future.
Pavlovian conditioning is when a previously neutral stimulus (like the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (like food) repeatedly, until the sound of the bell alone can trigger the same physical response as the sight, taste or smell of food. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is when positive or negative reinforcement (like rewards or punishments) are given in response to an organism's behavior, to increase or decrease the likelihood of that behavior repeating in the future.
Ξ±my
can you explain the difference between pavlovian and operant conditioning
π―πππππ―πππππ
I GOTCHU
π―πππππ―πππππ
The difference between Pavlovian and operant conditioning is a central topic in the field of behavioral psychology. Pavlovian conditioning is a type of classical conditioning, which was first described by the Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov in the early 20th century. In this type of conditioning, an otherwise neutral stimulus (such as the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (such as the smell or taste of food). Over time, the neutral stimulus comes to elicit the same physiological response as the biologically relevant stimulus, even in the absence of the latter. For example, Pavlov's experiments showed that dogs could be trained to salivate in response to the sound of a bell instead of the smell of food. He did this by ringing a bell every time he presented the dogs with food. After a while, the mere sound of the bell was enough to elicit a salivation response in the dogs, even if no food was present. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is a type of modern behaviorism that was developed by B.F. Skinner in the mid-20th century. In this type of conditioning, an organism's behavior is reinfo
Ξ±my
can you uh
Ξ±my
make it simpler
Ξ±my
iβm kinda dumb
Ξ±my
sorry
Cosmologistinterntobe
so, if dog hear bell ring and than food come, dog is make relation of bell to food, so when bell do the ringy dingy dog become hungry because bell is symbol of food
Cosmologistinterntobe
that simple enough?
Toast γ
hey cosmo
Cosmologistinterntobe
yo
Cosmologistinterntobe
wsg
Ξ±my
i asked for the difference.
π―πππππ―πππππ
Pavlovian conditioning is when a previously neutral stimulus (like the sound of a bell) is paired with a biologically relevant stimulus (like food) repeatedly, until the sound of the bell alone can trigger the same physical response as the sight, taste or smell of food. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is when positive or negative reinforcement (like rewards or punishments) are given in response to an organism's behavior, to increase or decrease the likelihood of that behavior repeating in the future.
Toast γ
hey madi
π―πππππ―πππππ
HI TOAST
π―πππππ―πππππ
wheres your pussy cat
Toast γ
How are you?
Toast γ
uhh
Toast γ
my pfp
Cosmologistinterntobe
cat
Toast γ
Ξ±my
ok thanks
Ξ±my
awww heβs so cute
Toast γ
jesus ,ado
Toast γ
her name's cutie pie
Ξ±my
?
Toast γ
*maid
Toast γ
maid
Toast γ
madi
Toast γ
fuclk
π―πππππ―πππππ
HEHEHEEH
π―πππππ―πππππ
CUTIEPIEEE
Ξ±my
my bad *she
Ξ±my
i keep confusing your cats
Toast γ
shes very shy
Toast γ
Ξ±my
AWWWWW
Toast γ
i wrapped her in a robe yesterday
Ξ±my
thatβs so cuteeee
Flappy.
WHENEVER I WRAP MY CAT IN THINGS
Flappy.
SHE GETS ALL MAD AND HISSY
Flappy.
how rude.
Flappy.
smh.
π―πππππ―πππππ
CAN I STEAL UR CAT
π―πππππ―πππππ
SHES SO CUTE
π―πππππ―πππππ
I WANNA TAKE UR CAT
Cosmologistinterntobe
why u wanna steal that pussy
Ξ±my
no iβm stealing her
Ξ±my
i think thatβs just cause sheβs autistic
The Unknown King of Moderation
madi likes pussy confirmed?
π―πππππ―πππππ
HEHEHEHEEH
Ξ±my
finally
The Unknown King of Moderation
back off amy she's mine
Ξ±my
please not on my post
The Unknown King of Moderation
grrrr
Ξ±my
i donβt want her
Ξ±my
wait that sounded mean
Ξ±my
sheβs not my type
π―πππππ―πππππ
yeah amy wants this FATASS
π―πππππ―πππππ
AHSIUHDUIFHIUFA
The Unknown King of Moderation
how dare you amy
Ξ±my
shut up youβre not scsry
The Unknown King of Moderation
you should be ashamed of yourself
The Unknown King of Moderation
smh
Ξ±my
okay
Ξ±my
i am going to fail
Ξ±my
my biology final
Cosmologistinterntobe
ouch.
Cosmologistinterntobe
biology sucks
Ξ±my
and i blame charles darwin
Ξ±my
and his stupid theory
Cosmologistinterntobe
no, blame bacon
Ξ±my
why couldnβt natural selection taken him
Ξ±my
i like bacon
π―πππππ―πππππ
pookie bearrr
Cosmologistinterntobe
Bacon was a monk. he did some work with some peas
Ξ±my
kill yourself jake.
Mafuyu Asahina
monke
Cosmologistinterntobe
no not monke. we is ap
βπͺ ππ¦π±π₯ ππ±π²ππ¦π‘
Rip
Mafuyu Asahina
ap
Cosmologistinterntobe
RETURN TO AP
Ξ±my
i got a 92 on my apcsp fina
Ξ±my
l
Mafuyu Asahina
RETURN TO AP
βπͺ ππ¦π±π₯ ππ±π²ππ¦π‘
Lol
Cosmologistinterntobe
*ap screeches*
Mafuyu Asahina
*AP NOISES*
Ξ±my
real life footage of jake
Mafuyu Asahina
who?
Ξ±my
w h o
Mafuyu Asahina
asked
Mafuyu Asahina
jk
Cosmologistinterntobe
lmao
Mafuyu Asahina
frfr
Cosmologistinterntobe
we be of the ap family
Mafuyu Asahina
ap family we live strong !!!
Cosmologistinterntobe
what have we of the ap tree made
π―πππππ―πππππ
no
Cosmologistinterntobe
no, we of the Great Ap Family
Cosmologistinterntobe
why you no consent to the great ap family
Cosmologistinterntobe
you must consent to us
π―πππππ―πππππ
cause
π―πππππ―πππππ
idc
Cosmologistinterntobe
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
π―πππππ―πππππ
hehehe